Saturday, May 28, 2011

Visualizing Identity in U.S. Greek Festivals

In a recent posting on Greek American festivals, Kostis Kourelis (kourelis.blogspot.com/2011/05/greek-william-penn.html) brings to our attention the significance of advertisement posters as yet another site where Greek American identity is visualized for external consumption. These flyers indeed constitute a "fabulous record of immigrant history," whose collection and study makes for an attractive research prospect. In this spirit I post the design above that speaks to the importance of material culture in representing identity.

• I thank Martha Klironomos for the Oakland festival flyer

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Diaspora Greeks




Saturday, May 14, 2011

Classical Heritage and Greek-American Literature














Classical Greece provides a powerful compass for Greek America. Just focus attention on any form of Greek-American cultural expression–the parade, theater, poetry, organization, festival, domestic or public decoration–and classical Greece invariably takes central stage. Greek Americans dress in classical costumes, parade replicas of the Parthenon, fund museum exhibits of Greek classical art, and support classical education. They name their organizations and places of gathering after Pericles, Athena, and the Acropolis. Classical texts and artifacts generate pride, endow prestige, offer enjoyment, and inspire learning. The classical heritage and Greek-American identity are tightly interwoven.

It is worth noting, however, that in popular and official usage the importance of classical Greece is often crystallized in general terms: classical Greece as the foundation of democracy; as the epitome of artistic achievement; as cultural property; as ethnic and world heritage. Less attention is directed to the question of how this heritage could concretely inspire the lives of individuals.

In my teaching about Greek America I explain why classical Greece operates as the bedrock of ethnic identity. But I make it one of my primary aims to discuss precisely how this heritage could speak to contemporary concerns. Greek tragedy and literature commonly inspire world and national literature, and modern authors draw from classical material to reinterpret issues of justice, authority, and values. It is apt, therefore, to ask how contemporary interpretations of Sappho or Euripides, for instance, help position us, say, on the issue of interethnic relations. How could they shape our values?

In this inquiry I turn to Greek-American literature. I examine how novels and short stories discuss the classical past and how these literary pieces could address contemporary concerns. I ask the question, how can fiction carry a real effect in life? A short story, Harry Mark Petrakis' "Pericles on 31st Street," serves my aims well.

Ethnic and class conflict drive the plot of the story, a social drama unfolding in a bar where the clientele, all ethnically marked, gathers to unwind over drinks. It is only the narrator, the bartender, who reveals no information about his ethnic background, claiming in this manner an objective standpoint. The divide is between a multiethnic mix of small shopkeepers who congregate together, and a lone peanut vendor, Nick Simonakis. Ethnic slurs and class insults dart between the two, poisoning the atmosphere. Simonakis' ethnocentrism, his belief, that is, in the superiority of classical Greece, greatly contributes to this conflict. "'Would you mind, old man,' Ryan said as he sat down, 'leaving a little bit of credit to the Irish'? 'I give them credit,' Simonakis said, 'for inventing the wheelbarrow, and giving the world men to push it.'"

But there is more to Simonakis' connection with the classical past. Significantly, he acts upon his identification with the figure of Pericles whom he interprets as the paragon of justice. For this Greek immigrant, Pericles epitomizes a vested orator who speaks the truth to defend public interest. He stands for a noble statesman committed to defeat the demagogues, orators who manipulate the public in order to enhance their own power at the expense of the interests of the polis.

It is this principle, defending the public good, that informs Simonakis’ stance as the plot unfolds. When the shopkeepers’ landlord unfairly raises the rent under false pretenses, Simonakis harnesses all his oratorical power to expose the landlord as a demagogue the way, he imagines, Pericles would have acted. Simonakis' unsolicited intervention serves as a catalyst to successfully mobilize the shop owners against this injustice, earning the admiration of his former adversaries. The story concludes with all the characters toasting their victory in the spirit of a newly found solidarity.

Petrakis' story takes up the relevance of the classical heritage today to provide a contingent answer. Heritage is not an inherently valuable resource, he seems to be telling us. Instead, the crucial question is how we utilize this heritage, what kinds of uses we imagine for it. Deployed in an ethnocentric way, he indicates, the connection with the past fuels ethnic conflict; in this case classical heritage works as a liability. But mobilized as knowledge to effect justice it serves the interests of vulnerable groups; here heritage works as an asset.

Let us note that Simonakis’ position is political in the sense that it does not hinge upon personal likes or dislikes. Neither is it mobilized because of shared ethnic ties. The motivating force to help others (the public interest) springs from his deep-seated principle of opposing those who use their power to exploit. This scorned immigrant acts upon values derived from the classical heritage, as he interprets it, to correct a wrongdoing. He adopts an ethico-political stance, underlining the power of the classical heritage as a usable resource to combat injustice in the present.

This use of literature in my classroom propels me to underline the importance of literature as a vital resource in the education of Greek Americans. I have in mind two places, beyond U.S. modern Greek studies, where literature's power to shape values and identities is indispensable: Greek language schools and leadership seminars.

In regards to the former, the translation of selective Greek-American texts into Greek has the potential to enrich the curriculum of early education. Discussing situations in America, the students' immediate environment, this material appears ideal for cultivating an ethos of cultural citizenship committed to justice, respect for difference, historical knowledge, and appreciation of Greek arts. In regards to the latter, the incorporation of literary texts in leadership seminars, now sponsored by the Next Generation Initiative, expands the scope of leadership beyond organizational, managerial, and personality skills. It is meant to shape leaders capable of appreciating the social and political uses of Greek learning, committed to advancing social justice, knowledgeable and sensitive to social issues, and conscious of the possibilities for and benefits of inter-ethnic solidarities. The initiative I propose will bring together educators, translators, academics, and cultural activists and will require to move beyond clichés and narrow conceptions of identity to advance the relevance of Greek learning in an increasingly complex world.

Cultivating an appreciation of the social and political aspects of literature raises a larger issue. Fellow Greek Americans invariably confront me with a recurrent set of questions: Why do groups x and y, I am asked, support cultural centers, museums, and archives to a greater extent than we do? Why do they produce and consume more literature, more films, more art, more scholarship? Why do they command greater coverage in the national media? These questions reveal a deep-seated anxiety. They underline the awareness that while others enjoy the lion's share of public visibility we are lagging behind, even as we pride ourselves on high educational achievements. This is a vastly complex issue. But if we genuinely aspire for cultural visibility we must invest in the appreciation of letters and the arts, nourishing the skills, knowledge, and imagination through Greek learning among the youth. If we wish to turn into a powerful cultural force contributing substantially to public debates we need highly educated bicultural artists, authors, scholars, educators, journalists, commentators, and critics. Are we committed to creating a public interested in making sense of ourselves and of the world through Greek paideia? This is an urgent question that Greek-American institutions cannot afford to postpone addressing.

• A slightly abbreviated version of this essay was published as "Pericles Should Be Across America, Not Just on 31st St." in The National Herald Online (5/20/11)

Monday, May 9, 2011

Greek American Graffiti




Diaspora Greeks




Saturday, April 30, 2011

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Pacifism in Translation


The arm and the army

Ο αρμός και οι αρμοί


Saturday, April 23, 2011

Diaspora Greeks




Saturday, April 16, 2011

Explaining Immigrant Mobility: Don’t Neglect the Race Factor

Review of Larry Odzak's “Demetrios is Now Jimmy: Greek Immigrants in the Southern United States, 1895-1965” (Monograph Publishers, 260 pages)

No single story can capture the experience of early immigrant Greek America. Men who toiled in the mines and railroad construction under dangerous labor conditions experienced immigration differently than those who owned small businesses. Men and women interacted with different American publics. Among women, those who were consumed by tradition-bound domestic chores saw America from a different angle than those women who worked as wage laborers. And the experience of those who conformed to dominant ideas cannot possibly compare to those who resisted what they saw as an unjust status quo.

Researchers have started to explore this fascinating heterogeneity. They have been focusing on previously neglected topics such as women, the working-class, cultural and political activists, and artists. At last, there is an interest in recovering views that have been socially marginalized, and in the process understanding the past from multiple perspectives.

“Demetrios is Now Jimmy” contributes to our understanding of one aspect of Greek America’s variety, regional diversity. Of course, the book addresses a well-covered topic, the economically successful male immigrant. But it also takes up an understudied topic with regional focus: Greek America in the American South during the Jim Crow era. This was a period of legal racial segregation (1876-1965) characterized by anti-foreignism and brutal racist violence.

This historical study is based on the author’s doctoral dissertation. Lazar “Larry” Odzak (b.1933) is currently an archivist-historian at the North Carolina State Archives. He received his Ph.D. degree in U.S. History from Strassford University (London, England, 2003). His book, “Demetrios is Now Jimmy,” follows academic conventions. The author sorts through a considerable corpus of scholarly works on immigration and ethnicity, whose citations are dispersed throughout the book. A readable account, the book provides useful archival information and oral testimonies on regional history. Comparative in scope, it dedicates whole chapters to immigrant adaptations in cities such as New Orleans, Birmingham and Tarpon Springs. Furthermore, a chapter exploring the “Formation and Development of Greek Immigrant Communities in the American South” includes discussions and comparisons of the cases of Atlanta, Jacksonville Savannah, Charleston, Raleigh, Charleston, and Mobile.

The book discusses the transformation of the Southern Greeks from immigrants to ethnic Americans through “selective adaptation.” The argument here is that immigrant adaptations must be seen as a process of acculturation, not wholesale assimilation. A key to the selective retention and inter-generational transmission of ethnicity was the early establishment of ethnic and religious institutions. To this end the author discusses the changes that defined two prominent institutions, American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (AHEPA) and the Greek Orthodox Church, up to the mid-1960s. A chapter entitled “Fraternal Bonding and Conservatism: Jimmy Joined AHEPA” situates the establishment of AHEPA and its subsequent development within the region’s racial politics. Another chapter, entitled “From Byzantine Rites to Civil Rights,” discusses the transformation of the Greek Orthodox Church in the South from immigrant to ethnic.

Because “Demetrios is Now Jimmy” is a book published by a non-university press, I will not review it in terms of its scholarly omissions and limitations. Though I will refer to some of its shortcomings, critiquing will not be my main focus. I will not reflect, for example, why a book that situates immigrants in the context of race relations and mobility utterly ignores important academic sources on “white ethnics,” labor struggles, and race. Rather, I wish to discuss the contributions that this work makes to our understanding of one aspect of Greek-American history, namely immigrant socioeconomic mobility, and to illuminate the implications of its findings for future research.

A particular research question animates the author’s project. The primary goal is to test the hypothesis known as the “Southern variant” of the Greek immigrant experience. First proposed by sociologist Charles Moskos, the hypothesis states, “Greeks in the South achieved economic and residential upward mobility faster and in greater proportion than Greeks elsewhere in the United States.” Odzak builds on empirical evidence to prove that this hypothesis is true in regards to self-employed immigrants, but not the working class. He compares the “ratio of Greek-owned businesses, excluding the itinerant vendors, to the total Greek population” in Northern cities to corresponding data in Southern cities, concluding that the percentage of self-employed immigrants was higher in the South. He also cites the early “Greek family formation in the South,” and the Southerners higher rates of immigrant intermarriage with whites as further evidence of mobility. The author believes that the “Southern variant” was caused by a combination of factors. They include: the importance of “timi” (honor), which prodded them to succeed in the workplace, the relentless pressure to assimilate, the acceptance of those who assimilated as “white,” and the smaller numbers of the Greeks in the south, which discouraged the formation of immigrant enclaves.

In his inquiry, the author places the immigrant Southern experience within the context of economic and racial relations in the region. On the one hand, he observes, the vision of an industrialized “New South” brought about dramatic population growth in cities and towns of the region. The example of Tampa, Florida, illustrates the scale of urban transformation. The town’s population grew from about 5,500 in 1890 to nearly 38,000 in 1910. This growth in turn created an urgent demand for a substantial service sector: groceries, cafes, quick lunch stores, dry cleaners and shoeshine parlors among others. The prospect of becoming a self-employed business owner catering to white society attracted to the South immigrants of various nationalities. There is mention of Jews, Italians, Syrians and Greeks, among others, but not of Asian immigrants. Here one must stress that Jim Crow segregation did not extend this crucial opportunity to African Americans. Therefore, it was immigrants who were recruited to fill this much-coveted economic niche.

The author points to the importance of cultural values to explain immigrant success. He covers a well-trod territory when he suggests that immigrants strove for mobility because failure would have compromised their “timi” (honor), shaming them in the eyes of their family and community. Thus, according to the author, it was the cultural dictates of the honor system that fuelled the desire to succeed at any cost. Consequently, hard work to the point of sacrifice, dogged persistence and frugality, are seen as causes that resulted in the much-sought-after financial security, even prosperity, among early immigrants.

One of the author’s contributions rests in showing how erroneous it is to explain ethnic success on the basis of cultural values alone. The discussion makes it clear that one must account how other variables in the host society – institutional and everyday racism for example – may propel some groups to the path of upward mobility, while barring this opportunity to others. Odzak takes into account how the pervasive racism against African Americans in the American South favored immigrant mobility.

In discussing the issue of male immigrant success in the context of economic and racial relations, this book parts from traditional Greek-American historiography. The fresh perspective is that in racially segregated regions it was the immigrants who were seen as the solution to a growing demand for service businesses, not local racial minorities. Odzak suggests that the relatively light tone of the immigrants’ skin provided the ticket for entering this economic niche in white society from which African Americans were excluded. He writes, “skin color helped a large proportion of the first generation Greek migrants to the Southern cities to achieve economic progress.” In other words, the “whiteness” of the immigrants worked as a racial privilege; it granted them a competitive advantage in a labor market that relegated African Americans to menial jobs. Therefore, the roots of immigrant success were partly embedded in a system of racial discrimination.

The historical record is unequivocal here. Immigrant mobility was not achieved in an environment of equal opportunity but occurred at the expense of African Americans. This realization must put to rest the popular belief that immigrants self-propelled themselves to mobility, that they rose exclusively on their own bootstraps. It counters the self-congratulatory rhetoric one hears so often in accounts about “white ethnic” success.

What about Southern anti-foreignism? In what ways did it affect the immigrants? The author makes a strong case that the integration of immigrants was conditional. In exchange for acceptance as “white” they were pressured to publicly display total conformity to the dominant culture. The case of a café owner in Pensacola, a certain Chris Lochas who was accused for violating Federal Law and was ran out of town by the Ku Klux Klan, illustrates the degree of public intimidation. Those who did not conform were targeted as unwanted cultural and racial outsiders.

The result of this climate of fear was the rampant Anglicization of names, adoption of the mannerisms and the ideologies of the dominant society, unconditional support of 100% Americanism, and en-mass joining of American fraternal organizations. It was this ruthless pressure to conform, the author suggests, that contributed to the immigrants’ upward mobility.

However, conformity was not merely limited to outward appearances in manners, dress and speech. Most significantly, the immigrant experience in the American South entailed a momentous historical compromise: compliance with the racial status quo of the region. Acceptance of a system of racial oppression was the tremendous cost that immigrants had to pay in order to ensure their business prospects. In the chapter on AHEPA, Odzak provides examples of the relationship between the all-powerful Klan and the Greek immigrants, showing how immigrants internalized and enacted the racial logic of Jim Crow. In addressing this hugely sensitive issue, the author is ambivalent. On the one hand, he embarks on an internal critique of the organization (the author mentions his affiliation with AHEPA in the dust jacket of the book), expressing discomfort in view of the fact that George Wallace, Alabama’s segregationist governor, became an AHEPA honorary member in the spring of 1964. On the other hand, he rushes to defend the immigrant acceptance of Jim Crow as a pragmatic, “prudent observance of the American Southern custom of segregation.”

The author sets himself the ambitious goal of covering 70 years of Greek immigrant adaptation in the South. But his discussion of the second and third generation is way too general and often sketchy. The aim to identify historical patterns and to paint history with broad strokes occludes particular events, everyday situations and minute incidents that do not fit the general pattern. One wishes, for example, that the author had dedicated fuller attention to the complexity of the racial situation in the South. It is well known that Greek immigrants elsewhere in the United States were initially classified as non-whites by many social scientists and the wider public. In the racially hierarchical taxonomy of that era they were seen as inferior to whites but superior to other racial groups such as Asian immigrants and African Americans. Scholarly studies on this subject convincingly show that occupation, participation in labor politics, and resistance to assimilation served as important criteria to classify immigrants as non-white in the American West and elsewhere. Unfortunately, the book pays only scant attention to how this racial dynamic played out in the South. It simplifies a vastly complex racial situation into a binary –“black and white” – system, where “the significant presence of blacks tended to raise white immigrants to the next rung.” The author ignores the presence of immigrants from Asia and does not elaborate on the “non-white” classification of and hierarchies among immigrants from Southeast Europe and the Middle East. He provides only a tantalizing example – the case of Lochas whose lack of acculturation was equated with a “non-white” status. But because the focus of the book is on the “successful,” acculturated male businessman, there is no attempt to document what happened to those who refused to assimilate. This inattention is illustrated in the unfortunate choice of words the author uses to describe unassimilated immigrants. In describing them as those who “were not able or skillful enough to show that they were ‘white’ and 100 percent American,” he fails to recognize those immigrants who consciously resisted assimilation.

A number of questions could guide future research. Did sectors within the immigrant community in the South (women, the working class, or wage laborers who eventually became small-business owners, for example) hold alternative visions of success? Did they resist racism and its cultural counterpart, 100% Americanism, embracing alternative visions of a socially and economically just American society? There is tantalizing evidence of resistance, when, for example, the author mentions in passing that “few brave voices (within the Greek community) were openly raised” in support of civil rights in the South. But the reader is left wanting more. Who resisted and how? How did public opposition to the racial status quo affect one’s life?

To answer these questions, researchers must seize the moment and shift attention away from the model of the economically “successful” male toward the study of those individuals or groups whose success entailed a vision and commitment to a more just society. We all stand to gain by identifying these unexplored pasts and by figuring out how these pasts can be of value to Greek America today.

Yiorgos Anagnostou

(Originally published in The National Herald, Book Supplement, Spring 2007)